________-Safe House-__________ – Page 2 – Where living becomes a performance.

Over and out!

Hayley Misseldine / May 13, 2013 / CCTV, Home, Rooms, Technical, West Parade

After four days and about 16 hours of performing…the safehouse is closed!
There were setbacks, complications and few expressionless audience members, but overall a huge success.
To lay out the scene – firstly a couple would ring the doorbell, where I would answer and ask them the password/phrase, in all cases they did know it, so luckily I didn’t have to shut the door in their faces, then I would take them through to the waiting room, which was minimalistic and fairly dark as the curtains to the window were closed to stop light filtering in, but also to avoid people from the outside as “it is nearly impossible to prevent your gaze from wandering into the private lives of others made suddenly visible” ((Heathcoate, Edwin, (2012), the Meaning of Home, London: Frances Lincoln Ltd, P.99)) and it would ruin the whole performance if the audience could see into the house before they themselves had even entered, as well as destroying the illusion of the ‘safehouse’ because if you can see into it so clearly – how is it safe?

The most challenging parts of my performance were firstly – being professional yet approachable as I found when I performed in a manner that was all corporate with practically no humanity that the audience were more withdrawn, and not as inclined to divulge any information I asked of them. After I had seen this error, I changed my demeanour and added a little more friendliness to my performance, and I saw instantly that almost all of the audience members seemed more relaxed and therefore were able to answer my questions with more ease. Another challenge I faced were difficult audience members, some were absolutely expressionless! It seemed that no matter what I did or said, nothing affected them. Even when I shine an incredibly bright light in their faces, they didn’t even blink. So to counter these types of audiences members, I cut off any of my friendliness, I treated the situation as if were incredibly serious, and for most of those difficult audience members – it seemed to work.

I also encountered several technical difficulties, I made a 3 minute video for the audience, which explains issues such as safety and audience decorum whilst they were in the house, it features Lizzy, portraying Agent L, she simply talks to the camera explaining said issues –

The problems I encountered with this were only small, on two occasions the video would not play, and I had to improvise – asking the audience more questions such as ‘what do you know about the art of spying?’ whilst working on the computer, and trying to get the video to play, which luckily succeeded before too much time had passed. Additionally I learnt after the video had been made, that there was only one fire exit, but had stated there were two on the video, which after it had been played, I reiterated back to the audience, but informed them of the new information, and showed them said fire exit on a map so the audience would have no doubts about what to do in the event of a fire. With the video, I was trying to create a sense of anonymity, letting the audience know that this is infact an operation, it is not just me in a room pretending to be a spy, Agent L is a part of the operation, her eyes are covered, her identity hidden. For those who saw performances where Lizzy was not there, her appearance on the video remains a mystery by building “electronic identities: out there, we are disembodied, depersonalised.” ((Pearson, Mike, (2010), Site-Specific Performance, Palgrave Macmillan, P.125.)) Which I believe adds a more realistic element to the performance.

The most problematic technical problem however were the phones – the CCTV room and I had worked into our performances phone calls back and forth, with at one point whomever was performing in the CCTV room speaking directly to the audience via speakerphone. The problem that ensued were connectivity related – occurring more often than I would’ve like, the person upstairs would miss their queue to ring, and I would have to call them instead, but for some reason the calls would not connect, leaving an awkward silence the first time it happened. Of course after the first encounter with this problem, despite not being able to fix the technical side, I prepared more dialogue and more opportunities for the audience to speak whilst the problem was occurring. With enough foresight I managed to overcome any future possibilities of silent moments, which made for a better performance.

The only other problem I encountered were timekeeping related – making sure I let people into the house at the right time, only having two couples in the house at one time. This was difficult if we overran, or were under the time schedule. Making sure I knew where everyone was at any given time was the biggest responsibility I undertook, and making sure everything ran smoothly was probably the hardest part of the whole performance.

Altogether, I feel like the performance as a whole went incredibly well, and I am proud of my participation in it. I have learnt new things about myself, and found a new sense of self-believe in my abilities which I will carry with me in the future.

Our time in the Safe House has come to an end.

Lauren Hughes / May 13, 2013May 13, 2013 / CCTV, Performance process

Well it’s all over! I can comfortably say not one have us has ever experienced anything quite like the past few months. Site Specific has not only given us and hopefully the audience members an experience to remember, it’s opened up Drama as a subject even further for us as students.
For the CCTV group it’s been harder than we first predicted, we’ve gone from holding placards to the cameras, leaving messages around the house, treasure hunts, to finally finding something worthy of a performance. Instead of focusing on relaying messages to the audiences we decided to show the house in a different context, at night.

Going back to my first blog post, I reeled off the ideas and emotions that came to mind when I first entered the house on West Parade. When looking back now a few of my ideas were trialed and tested and eventually used in the final performances. Our group always wanted to use the CCTV to our advantage, for example whether we informed the audience they were being watched or to leave them to figure it out for themselves.

When the rehearsal process progressed so did our ideas, with the final piece being called Safe House, it developed our ideas for the CCTV room even further. Joining the CCTV group and Hayliegh in the Reception, we were the Agents within the Safe House ensuring their visit goes smoothly. With Hayliegh welcoming the two audience members to the house for their induction in the reception, she listed some rules and regulations within the house. There was then a phone call between me and the downstairs phone on speaker, asking the audience members questions about their choice of clothing, interrogating them as to whether they considered their clothing as a disguise when making way to the Safe House and so on and so forth.

On my performance evenings of the 1^st and 2^nd of May, improvisation was done during the performances mainly through the phone calls identifying individual visual aspects of each audience member. Identifying personal aspects ensured they knew they were being watched which clearly changed their body language straight away. Being in the Safe House for two performance evenings meant I had the opportunity to see several audience members explore the house and how each individual reacted differently to our weeks of work. When the audience members came across our room towards the end of their time in the house, several entered bewildered discussing their individual experiences, some came in quiet, calm and collected, others even tried interacting with me trying to provoke a reaction. The performance evenings were very exciting and nerve wrecking giving the improvisational aspects, it was fantastic seeing the reactions some audience members had when being asked personal questions about their appearance, watching their eyes race around the room before seeing the camera. One particular audience member entered the CCTV room at the end and were astonished they had been watching throughout the whole piece immediately saying in shock “Oh my goodness they’ve been watching us the whole time!?”

Choosing to leave the CCTV on for the audience members worked out really well, flipping the whole evening in their eyes on it’s head it was fantastic seeing their reaction, after watching this performance for the past sixty minutes and realising they were a part of it and that contradiction of all the performers now being unaware they were being watched. Although ours was an installation piece I was pleased we had the chance to see for ourselves the reaction the audiences had to our work. I can’t quite put my finger on it but there was something magical about watching the audience’s reaction to seeing the house as a whole on the CCTV screen.

Going back to the audience being a part of the performance the Living Room was probably the only room in which the audience had chance to be a performer knowingly. Some audience members literally sat with the performers for the full ten minutes, which was frustrating in that they didn’t explore the room they had put so much effort into. However the realisation set in that they may be trying to be a part of that performance as one audience member in particular sat still with them for the full ten minutes which could have been for that reason or maybe just the anxious, vulnerability they were feeling. The only sad aspect to the performance evenings was not being able to have a feedback session with the audience members afterwards to understand what was going through their minds and also what they took from each individual performance and if it was what we set out to accomplish or something totally different.

Espionage 101:

Hayley Misseldine / May 13, 2013 / Documentation, Home, Performance process, Research, Rooms

After spending a couple months working on the estate agent idea, the concept of the performance changed – as we could not come up with a name for our performance, when it was finally decided, everything changed, mostly for me. The new concept was called Safehouse – for most of the rooms in the house, this did not affect them, but primarily for me and the CCTV room it did. I had to change my performance to fit accordingly, now I was a ‘spymaster’ in charge of the whole Safehouse, my room no longer needed to look welcoming, so the ‘inspirational’ poster idea was out.

This idea to me was more exciting than the estate agent plan, as soon as I was aware of the change I had many different ideas about what I could do, and where I could go with this. The first thing I did was to get myself familiar with the perception of a spy, I watched two films in particular, the first being called Safehouse –

In this film, Ryan Reynolds plays the ‘housekeeper’ which is essentially what my role would be, the film is American, and with it are the American spies which in this case are the CIA. According to this film, being the ‘housekeeper’ of a safehouse is a small task, assigned to young, inexperienced agents, which explains why the term ‘housekeeper’ is used. On the other hand, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy;

is a film about British espionage, the safehouse used within the films plot, is a place not only to keep from being detected, but is used to pass along secret information, a woman lives there under a pretence that it is her home in order to avoid detection, and in a way she is the ‘spymaster’ or ‘housekeeper’ of that particular safehouse.

These two film versions of the type of character I will perform are completely different in a sense that one is for certain an agent/spy, whilst the other is most likely a civilian. At the same time, both of these characters are similar in their inexperience which is something that I will infact be, although I will be performing it differently in the sense that I want to appear experienced and professional to the audience, so they will believe as much of it as possible.

The dictionary defines the term safehouse as – “a dwelling or building whose conventional appearance makes it a safe or inconspicuous place for hiding, taking refuge, or carrying on clandestine activities” (((2013), Dictionary.com, Online: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/safe+house (accessed: 12 May 2013).)) In keeping with this point, we decided to apply a password/passphrase to the performance; we would give out four different passwords/passphrases to the audience members for each of the four days we were performing. I was told if someone forgot the password/passphrase or said it incorrectly, I would not let them inside, just shut the door in their face. I had to rewrite a new script and a new script for the short video we would be showing the audience, primarily discussing issues such as safety and how they should conduct themselves in the house.

In regards to costume and set design, the term I would use to describe it as a whole – minimalistic, strip everything down to the bare minimum, a spy would have no need for unnecessary objects cluttering up their room, and I wanted to look organised and appear to know what I’m doing. But I am aiming to make the room devoid all any personality, it will be as if I have just walked in a put some things on the desk, and if necessary, will be able to leave in a second if I have to. I need to make sure the audience know that my life in the house is temporary, this is not my home – it is my job. The audience will feel uncomfortable and unsafe in my presence, which is to set up how they should be feeling for the majority of time around the house, “Thus the dwelling must not only express an individual, but at the same time reflect a long past, if it is to give us a feeling of security and stability in life”. ((Bollnow, Otto (2011), Human Space, Hyphen Press, P.145))

Fear and loathing in the waiting room.

Hayley Misseldine / May 13, 2013 / Documentation, Home, Performance process, Research, Rooms

Deciding what to do with my space was the hardest part of the whole process, unlike most of the other rooms and their inhabitants, I didn’t have a game plan as such, which I think came from my initial dislike of the room. I had written down ten impressions I had of the room from the first day, clearly expressing what I felt whenever I was left alone in that room –

Isolated
I hate waiting
Sat in silence
Let your standards go…
Random rage
Mindless banality
Separated from the rest
The room where nothing happens…
This room is not interesting!
The only truthful room.

The only observation I took that day was the last point – the waiting room is the only truthful room. It is the only room in the house that is not a façade Knowing this, I felt like I could only use the room for its intended purpose, it brought out the most inspiration in me. It would have to be something that felt corporate; it couldn’t feel like part of the home, due to how it was furnished – “An austere office room with its functional furniture does not have a homelike effect and is not intended to do so, because it is intended to put one in the mood for concentrated work. The furniture must fill the space in such a way that the impression is neither of emptiness nor of overcrowding” ((Bollnow, Otto (2011), Human Space, Hyphen Press, P.144))

I was given the idea that I could perform under the pretence of an estate agent – my room to be the office where I give the audience background information of the property, and the rest of their experience in the house would be a ‘tour’ of the house. This idea resonated with me instantly, it gave me new inspiration, like the room I despised finally made sense, and I started to become excited to work on it, rather that loathing it. Now that I was working with the rooms aesthetics rather than against it, gave me more ideas on how it could be used, and how it would be perceived by the audience, I wrote a rough script on how exactly the estate agent idea could possibly work, starting with the audience knocking on the front door, I answer it, and it proceeds from there. I had a few ideas about how I could change up the furniture in the room, so it could be perceived as both corporate, but also welcoming at the same time:

To make the room seem less bare and therefore more personable, I thought ‘inspirational’ posters in bright eye-catching colours would be a fitting substitute. On the other hand, if the poster concept did not work, I thought possibly a large mirror, or several small mirrors would add an interesting aspect to the space as it makes a room seem larger or “a kind of alternative window, not only to the outside world but on the interior”. ((Heathcoate, Edwin, (2012), the Meaning of Home, London: Frances Lincoln Ltd, P.135.))

My role would be the initiator – the person who introduces the audience to the whole performance, I would in theory be setting up what is to come, the ‘inspirational’ posters would have hints as to what the other rooms performances would be, for example – for the kitchen, the poster’s artwork was of a steaming cup of tea accompanied by rabbit ears – these aspects were not so subtle, yet from an audiences point of view would be completely unexplainable until they saw the kitchen performance.

After my ten minutes of performing, I would lead the audience out, and subject to further decisions, I would guide them either upstairs to Louise, or into the living room/cupboard room.

A Reflection of Invisible Rituals/Life Beyond the Window

Ellen Louise Pearson / May 12, 2013May 13, 2013 / Documentation, Performance process, Rooms, West Parade

Final performances

My Role

For the first two nights of our performance my role was to be a curator of my installation pieces as well as a guide telling the audience members which room to go to next. However, as I was on the landing at all times it meant that people didn’t feel free to explore the space or express opinions. This was especially true for the toilet room as even though I asked each audience member if they wanted to explore the room, only two did so.

As an experiment, on the third night I agreed with the performers in the other rooms that I would hide, mostly in the CCTV room, and observe how the audience reacted to the installations without being watched or feeling coerced. This had very encouraging results, with verbal responses to both installations replacing the silences of the first nights, and every audience member looking around the toilet installation.

A Reflection of Invisible Rituals – Video Performance/Installation

My final video consisted of six different rituals, of around two minutes each, played on an infinite loop. The order of the videos came from looking at everyday lives and the order in which people tend to do these actions; cleansing (wiping my face), drying (talcum powder), grooming (brushing hair), moisturising, daydreaming (looking into the camera) and writing in a diary (writing on a mirror). I also put a different twist on all of the videos in order to make the audience think about those actions in a different light.

Above: My final performance video. ((Louise Peason (2013) Louise’s Site Specific performance video. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WAwnDoNSu-A (Accessed: 12th May 2013). ))

For the cleansing, grooming and moisturising videos I tried to slow down or extend the usual way in which we would perform these actions, turning something we would do in under ten seconds, into an action extending to two minutes. This was similar for the drying, day-dreaming and writing in a diary, but as an alternative to extending the length of the ritual I altered the way in which I performed them. Instead of using talcum powder in the usual way, I poured it slowly over my feet until I was eventually covered with powder and stepped out of the frame, leaving a shadow where my feet had been. Inspired by Marina Abramovic and the story of Orpheus and Eurydice my daydreaming video comprised of me staring into the camera, as opposed to a spot in the distance, and ‘snapping out’ of the day-dream when I suddenly turn to look behind me.

For my final video I played with the idea of mirror writing (a style of writing that is also sometimes used for secret messages, like in a diary) as when reflected the backwards writing will actually read forwards. This was an interesting video to observe reactions to, to see if audience members figured out that the writing was actually created backwards.

For my set up of this installation I had intended the mirror to face the staircase so that the audience could see themselves as they came up the stairs, but due to health and safety restrictions, as well as the mirror not being free-standing, I decided to hang the mirror on the wall at a 90° angle to the stairs. This did mean that it was safer for my video monitor and stand as they were further into the landing, rather than being close to the top of the stairs. To the wall with the mirror on it I added a short description of the installation and a backwards clock to add to the theme of reflections and altering the perspective of time in which we perform the rituals. In addition it had a practical purpose, giving me a clock to keep track of where the audience members should be at particular times.

Top Left: The video monitor from the top of the stairs. ((Pearson, Louise (2013) Video Installation [Photograph]. ))
Top Right: The audience’s view of the monitor through the mirror. ((Pearson, Louise (2013) Audience’s perspective [Photograph]. ))
Below: My installation description. ((Pearson, Louise (2013) Video description [Photograph]. ))

Reactions to my video varied, with many responses that I hadn’t anticipated. An interesting comment was that my video might be a live stream of me in a different house and if they asked a question then I might respond. There were also some responses to my mirror writing with people exclaiming “she’s writing backwards on a mirror, in a mirror!” which was very satisfying as I was relieved that people understood the complexity of that clip. The most satisfying reaction to my video was in response to the hair brushing clip, when one audience member likened it to the horror film The Ring which used similar videos of everyday activities just before the girl crawls out of the screen. The audience member feigned fear that he would die in seven days or that I would come out the screen to attack them. This reaction was something I had not considered, having never watched The Ring. It was fascinating to see such a diverse range of reactions to my video, each observer’s own imagination or experiences shaping their interpretations.

If I was to ever re-film this installation or perform in the house again I would create a longer video, either by adding new rituals to it, or extending the existing videos as (due to the ten minute performances in each room) when audience members left the different rooms they always ended up seeing the same clips. I would also find a more effective way of covering my monitor stand as the sheet which covered it didn’t give a very neat finish, although it did serve the purpose effectively of hiding the DVD player and all the wiring. If I could, I would still like to try having the mirror facing the stairs rather than at an angle so that the full effect can be experienced of discovering the installation immediately when coming up the stairs. This would be useful as some audience members did not understand that the video is to be viewed through the mirror and instead stood to the side of the monitor observing it from the front. In terms of the video content I would try to create a higher quality video, experimenting even further with the speed and style of my movements as well as controlling the brightness and focus of my videos which automatically refocused at inconvenient points. I would want to re-film my talcum powder clip as the colour of the carpet was quite distracting and did not match the neutral tones of the other clips.

Life Beyond the Window – Installation

My final installation piece comprised of 50 individual sheets of observations which were photocopied several times. The reason I chose to do this rather than write an entire room’s worth of observations is the amount of time it takes to write a single sheet of A4 paper; the 50 sheets took an exceptionally long time to write by hand but when stuck up covered less than half of the narrow wall. However, the result of sticking up the large number of sheets to the walls, ceiling and both sides of the door was an impressive installation, and unless closely inspected, it was hard to tell that each page was not individual.

Left: Low angle of installation ((Pearson, Louise (2013) Low angle of the Installation [Photograph]. ))
Right: Toilet wall ((Pearson,Louise (2013) Toilet wall [Photograph]. ))

I attached a description of the installation to the door, and set the engaged/vacant sign to ‘engage’ as a subtle message to the audience to engage with the installation rather than become introverted, as is usually the case when one uses this room. I also left the light on and the door wide open so that it could be seen by people coming up the stairs.

Above: My toilet installation description ((Pearson, Louise (2013) Installation description [Photograph]. ))
Below: Engage sign ((Pearson, Louise (2013) Engage [Photograph]. ))

During the performance it was difficult to get any audible responses to this installation but over the CCTV cameras it could be seen that the toilet installation was more interesting to some audience members than the video performance; when I wasn’t on the landing the toilet room was actually the first place most audience members were drawn to. My fellow performers complimented me on how impressive the installation was and they were appreciative of having something interesting to read when they had to use the facilities.

Above: A panorama of my toilet installation. ((Louise Pearson (2013) Louise’s Installation Panorama. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nx2rW0kDhYE (Accessed: 12^th May 2013). ))

If I was to do this again I would dedicate much more time to generating the observations so that the room could be filled with unique pages, thus making it even more impressive. I would also use different sizes, types and colours of paper in order to make the final project look more visually appealing. The variation in size would create an easier way of ‘wall-papering’ the odd shapes and pipes on the walls.