The Room of Dreaming

My first impressions of the house were that it already had its own atmosphere. My favourite room, though, was the main bedroom for many reasons. It seemed like the most artificial of all the rooms. The décor was as drab as all the others, but the way it was furnished made it look false. The bedding was neatly made, and the bedside table and lamp were in pristine condition. I instantly thought that this room was hiding something. The distinct lack of furniture was unnerving. The room simply consisted of a bed in the centre, a bedside table with a lamp, and a built in cupboard on the wall.

IMG00066-20130122-1309

The bedroom is considered a very familiar and secretive space. Cupboards are also renowned for this, “their doors open onto an ever more private realm of intimate things” ((Heathcote, E (2012) The Meaning of Home, London: Frances Lincoln, p 77)). As a visitor in someone’s home you rarely open a cupboard unless instructed to. In my mind, this makes the cupboard in the bedroom twice as private as anywhere else.

There are three main concepts or feelings associated with a cupboard. The obvious one is for storage. Generally, clutter and mess can be hidden neatly away in a cupboard as long as nobody finds it. Secondly, as highlighted so cleverly by Pixar, children often believe that monsters hide in their wardrobes or cupboards. This immediately sparks the emotion of a fear of the unknown. Finally, thanks to C.S Lewis, they can be seen as a place for escapism. All three of these uses can be either portrayed through performance or they can be turned upside down and contradicted.

To portray storage you could simply clutter the wardrobe with either things you wouldn’t associate with a house or very familiar objects.

“Clothes, the contents of the wardrobe are, of course, intimate items” ((Heathcote, E (2012) The Meaning of Home, London: Frances Lincoln, p 78.))

What if we filled it with even more intimate items to make the audience feel uncomfortable or make them feel like they have breached their rights as a visitor?

The escapism aspect could be shown through dreaming. Once the audience member was in the bed the cupboard could be opened. Inside could be filled with dream like objects, fairy lights, tinsel etc. It could also be effective to have a projector inside that projects footage of a dream onto the wall opposite. This would create a huge contrast between the bedroom and the cupboard and highlight the fact that a cupboard is a hiding place for a person, objects or even for thoughts.

The work of Lital Dotan also gave me a lot of inspiration for performance ideas. She uses the technique of installation in her own home. She opens her own bedroom to the public. She lifts her mattress against the wall every day. “The underside reveals a “personal graffiti wall,” covered in loose colorful yarn stitched to form Dotan’s various notes to self:”(Ortiz 2013)

Dotans-bed

Dotan’s bed / art project (Photo by Emily Wilson)  (accessed: 12/02/13) ((Ortiz, Jen (2013) ‘Life as a Glass House’ Narratively, 25 January. http://blackboard.lincoln.ac.uk/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_67088_1%26url%3D))

This flips the notion of the bedroom being the most private room in the house on its head. Turning it into a form of gallery makes it the most public space. This is an intriguing notion to look at possibly using for a couple of the performance dates.

First Impressions.

Being in a house today has really opened my eyes to the wonders of theatre and art. Performing in a house has so much potential, with its intimacy and history of the property. There’s so many unique rooms with individual characteristics that would add to the performance. Being in a house limits our audience as we can only have twenty people in the house at one time, this makes the performance itself so intimate that it changes the dynamic of the performance.

Comparing to the norm of the theatre where you have an acting space and seating area there’s quite a distance between spectator and actor. However, being in a house changes this as there’s no specific place where audience are seated which changes the distance between the performers and the spectators this gives a different atmosphere to the performance itself.

After the session we had today looking around the house we can already see the potential of a brilliant performance. The house has CCTV in every room apart from the obvious bathroom areas, I like the idea of using CCTV as part as the performance as it give us more variety and could possibly expand our audience. We can use pre-recorded videos and stream them in the house or elsewhere.

Part of the session today was to find a room that we like and could potentially make a performance in; I chose the living room as you could do so much with it and had a personal connection with me. In the living room everything seems to happen, family gatherings, birthdays, Christmas, parties and so much more. A personal memory triggered me when I entered this room. I was only a child and thought I would surprise my mum after she went out to the pub with her boyfriend. So I waited up and when I heard them coming through the door I hid in the living room. I was going to jump out and surprise her. This was when I saw her boyfriend at the time physically abusing her being in that room it always reminded me of that night.

Some might think this inappropriate, but the reason why I put this on the blog was because not all nice things happen in such a happy area, and behind all those smiles and laughter something bad might just be hiding, covered by the ‘act’ we are forced to put on when inviting people into our home.

I had many ideas of performances that could occur in this room, one was man and wife sat in the living room sat watching a loop of their memories of Christmas, birthday’s, family gathering, parties etc. Whilst they are sat there with just blank expressions let the audience come in sit with them or stand watching them or the T.V.

Reflections and first impressions

Seeing and being in the house for the first time has filled me with all sorts of thoughts, ideas and excitement about the potential of our work here.

Firstly, with all the rooms, there is such opportunity to have so much going on for an audience or “visitors” to see and engage with. Personally, rather than looking at the house as a whole, I have been seeing individual performance spaces – what happens in a lounge is so different from what happens in a bathroom and so, performances in these spaces could and probably would be vastly different.

I’m generalising, but I just like the idea of something different going on in every room, perhaps even using the CCTV in every room but in different ways. For example, I love the thought of exploring the idea of voyeurism so that could be explored in one room, using the CCTV in that creepy/ stalker way – obviously, as someone suggested, using the audience in some way, with this idea of being watched. Also, I like the idea of contrasting images on the TV, showing what really happens in a particular room behind closed doors, with the audience being treated as visitors; I think the lounge would be an ideal place for this. I also like the idea that in another room, we could explore the very different experiences/ ideas people have in relation to home or that particular kind of room, and perhaps have something live happening, along with a variety of vastly different examples of peoples experiences in the same room, shown in loop on the TV.

The house

Photo taken 01/02/2013 by Jozey Wade

One thing I wanted to mention about the reading, that we addressed in a way in class, is the idea, as Pearson suggests: “a  places owes it’s character not only to the experiences it affords as sights, sounds etc. but also to what is done there…” ((Pearson, Mike (2010) Site-Specific Performance, Palgrave Macmillan)). I think this idea of a place having a character or an atmosphere related to what has happened there, on top of the actual physical look/ smell of the place, definitely directly relates to the house we are using.

As we discussed in the session today, the fact that we know the house is used for what it is used for, automatically creates certain images and feelings in our head when looking at or visiting certain rooms. For example, although a bathroom is usually a place I feel most safe or relaxed – due to door locks, being alone and undisturbed, nice hot baths etc – when I was in the bathroom at this particular house, horrible and extreme as it sounds, images of awful things like suicide, accidents with electrics popped into my head. Obviously, this is due to the atmosphere I feel there because of knowing the negative connotations related to what the house is used for. The marks on the wall and peeling paint (as can been in the picture below) add the that feeling of unease and remind me of the true usage of the house.

The housePhoto taken 01/02/2013 by Jozey Wade

However, an audience may not know about the usage and history of the house, so will the house have the same atmosphere to them? Probably not. So what will an audience, with no knowledge of the house at all, feel when they enter and explore it? What will the atmosphere be like to them? It might be important to keep this in mind.

A Couple of Things.

After our module meeting tonight, I thought I’d take the plunge and do one of the few posts here (that’s assuming that loads of people haven’t posted in the time I’m writing this, then I’ll look like a right wally!)

Conan talking to us about the concept of home really got me thinking about where I truly identify with as ‘home’. I’ve moved around a fair bit and I’ve never really felt anchored to a particular physical place – I feel national pride, for my country, I definitely think of myself (and am proud of) as being British but I’ve never really felt a sense of local pride and loyalty.

Home for me isn’t necessarily where you’re from – I was born in London and in a way consider myself being from there, even though I lived there for a grand total of 3 months. I grew up in a small town in Hampshire but my memories of that place are so hazy that I can’t truly say that I identify that place as having been home. At 8 I moved to Portsmouth, which is where I’ve lived the longest, but I’ve never identified myself as being ‘from’ there – the city doesn’t seem home to me. It’s familiar, yes, but not ‘Home’. Coming to Lincoln then, since Portsmouth wasn’t a home environment to me, hasn’t seemed too much of a displacement – I’ve never felt a gut-wrenching desire to go back to Portsmouth, like some other people have (not to Portsmouth, to their own homes).

I’m rambling here, as I haven’t properly set out my thoughts and this is just becoming a garbled stream of consciousness, so, dear reader, please forgive me.

What I’m trying to say, I suppose, is that the idea and sensation of ‘home’ has never been physical for me. Home, to me, is a metaphysical state – or, to use the common aphorism, ‘Home is where the heart is’. To be surrounded by the warmth and love of family or friends, THAT is what makes a place home. Thus, for me, home is everywhere and nowhere and I really hope that that feeling can be conveyed somehow on West Parade.

 

The other thing I wanted to talk about was one of the pieces of reading that we were given at some point in the holidays. One cold Winter evening (much like this one) I had a read of a piece on Blackboard called ’25 instructions for performances in cities’ by Carl Lavery, which I heartily recommend you all have a read of as well (don’t worry, it’s only a couple of pages and is very interesting, I promise. If you’re interested it’s in the ‘texts’ folder under learning materials).

Basically, it’s what I would call a ‘Ronseal Deal’ if I were a Conservative Prime Minister – it does exactly what it says on a tin. It’s a quite compelling list of 25 activities (that’s unfortunately the best word I could think of to describe them, it’s a tad inadequate) that performers who want to do a site-specific performance in a city may want to try out so that they can engage with what it means to be in a city on some level. Some are very simple, like number 4, which suggests setting up a camera and filming a section of city for a couple of hours and editing the footage together. Some ask quite a lot of the performers, like 9, which says to make the public private, i.e.: live outside for a day doing everything you would do in your own home – sleeping, eating, brushing your teeth, etc. A few still are entirely conceptual and very vague in how one might approach the task, for example: ’17. Create a forest in the city’.

The reason I bring up this article (other than not really having any other outlet to really talk about it in) is that I’m curious. Do any of you, dear readers, find any of these instructions interesting? Are there even some of you who want to give them a go – I certainly want to and it would be great if some people in this group would like to experiment with the idea presented here.

So, please, contribute your thoughts, I’m really interested to know what you all think!

References:

Lavery, C., 2005, Teaching Performance Studies: 25 instructions for performance in cities [e-journal] 25(3) pp.286-289. Available through: The University of Lincoln Blackboard website <blackboard.lincoln.ac.uk> [Accessed 14 January 2013]