Things that go bump in the dark.

For our final piece the CCTV group decided to create a piece of installation art using the fascinating piece of equipment at our disposal. Marita Sturken states that “An installation both defines and contains space, situating, if not controlling the viewer within it.” (( Erika Suderburg (2000) Space, Site, Intervention: situating installation art. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. P. 287 ))  The idea for our piece was that while in the CCTV room the audience would be able to experience every other room in the house, placing them in a position where they could understand the format and use of the space in a way that they had not experienced it in the rest of the performance. Seeing as all of the rooms were occupied during the performance we decided to see what it would be like for the rooms to be captured with very few signs of life, and once we realised the potential that this emptiness created we decided to stick with it.

Full screen night filming by Lizzy Hayes, Lauren Hughes, Faye Mcdool
Seeing the rooms from a different perspective reminded me of Bollnows Human Spaces (2011) and how different each of our safe house rooms were from the definitions and purposes he proposed. Bollnow states that the furnishings and furniture play a part in the aura of a room and that “bare, empty rooms have a chilling effect” ((Bollnow, O.F (2011) “Human Space” London: Hyphen Press, p. 144)) and that “disorder and neglect have a quieting effect” ((Bollnow, O.F (2011) “Human Space” London: Hyphen Press, p. 144)) and due to the empty and neglected state the house was in it was easy to agree with him.
The emptiness and neglected state of the house became emphasised in the dark state that we filmed in.

IMG-20130122-00470

Image by Jozey Wade 2013

The cot room (above) had a chilling, spooky quality to it that does not represent home, even in the day light. As many of the ‘residents’ have mentioned, we doubt that the room would feel that bad if it wasn’t for the presence of the cot itself. But I think it was key for us to remember when filming was that the room was made to feel so unsettling on purpose. The true nurturing purpose of a child’s nursery is lost in a sort of dark translation in the house due its requirements for training and we were able to use that to our advantage when filming, making the images we captured as uncomfortable as the actor being filmed felt.

Installation piece- Cot Room By Lizzy Hayes, Lauren Hughs, Faye Mcdool

Other spaces that in the day time might not be pleasant, but had never been scary, transformed beyond what I imagined they would. The kitchen became colder and harsher and the introduction of a spot light to the living room gave the opposite effect to the warmth that we expected.
Instead of just filming the bare rooms we had one of us walk through or occupy the space in a minimalistic manner. Bollnow suggested that  “the dwelling becomes an impression of the individual who dwells in it” ((Bollnow, O.F (2011) “Human Space” London: Hyphen Press, p. 145)) and I think that in capturing snippets of life in each room we were in effect stating that the people who were seen are not permanent residents, but are instead shadows passing through. These hints of movement acted as suggestions of life in an otherwise still setting. Without realising it I think we created something very much like Gary Hills installation piece, The Viewer, which I talked about in a previous post, in that the person seen in each image was not there to be interacted with or to portray a character, but were there to prove their existence.
The final result of this nights filming was nine separate one minute clips of footage, each representing one room and containing a different movement at a different time.

The Void.

The TV now plays a big part in our homes; it’s what centers our lives as well as social media. If we’re not catching the latest episode of ‘Embarrassing Bodies’ or watching the new Nicki Minaj music video then we’re not cool. TV has ruined our world, we all become hypnotized by the box and not engaging or socializing with family and/or friend’s we live with. This is making the living room feel like there’s no life as everyone is just in a trance, making it go back to what the living room originally was used for and being “The living dead room” (( Heathcote, E (2012) The Meaning of Home London:Frances Lincoln.)).

 photo 734031_439763769427834_1507547987_n.jpg
Photo Taken:  05/03/2013  credit to: Libby Soper.

With the living room normally been left for best and for when visitors came, now we take the space for granted. These spaces used to have laughter music and life, now all we have is lifeless people staring into a void of nothingness.

With being in the living room we expanded our idea of us doing what we normally do in the living room and take it to the extreme so it points out to the audience just how much we sit stare and do nothing. What happens if we take the norm to an extreme?  In today’s session we played around with the idea myself, Lauren and Sam all took different positions in the living room facing the TV which had a paused image on the screen. Adding to this we all had a still position that we would keep for an hour to get the Spectator’s reaction, fellow peers came in and sat down and after they experienced this we approached them to see what they felt and they said they felt uneasy and that the living room had a different atmosphere.

To develop the idea of making the norm into the only thing we do with the world living around us with the pizza boxes and the booze bottles on the floor to show that the room has been lived in and that the room had life.

 

Installing…
Please wait…

“Installation art actively engaged with the experience of the human perception, which tested its limits and expanded its possibilities” ((Oliveira, Nicolas de, Nicola Oxley and Micheal Petry (2003) Installation Art in the New Millennium, London:Thames & Hudson, Ltd., p. 6.)).

Mixing Installation Art and a live performance. Can they be argued to be intertwined?

Borofoky, Jonathan (2000), ‘Dream Drawings (1971-87)’ in Susan Hiller Dream Machines, London: Hayward Gallery Publishing, p. not paginated. Shankie, John (2000), ‘Go To Sleep (1995)’ in Susan Hiller Dream Machines, London: Hayward Gallery Publishing, p. N.P.

 

Robert Storr states that “the experience they provide is much like wandering onstage and picking up loose pages from a script, overhearing bits of recorded dialogue and trying to figure out what the setting is…and what actions might still be taken” ((Oliveira, Nicolas de, Nicola Oxley and Micheal Petry (2003) Installation Art in the New Millennium,  London:Thames & Hudson, Ltd., pp. 17-18.)). If we create an installation performance, rather than a simple piece of tangible art, we are hoping it will have the same effect; two separate, yet intricately combined performances happening simultaneously, yet only one audience member is directly engaged with one of two performances, creating a sense of anticipation, wondering what will happen next, and with who the performance will engage with.

If our bodies become a piece of installation art work, this would change the dynamic of the performance – rather than simply having the audience members as passive onlookers, we turn them into active voyeurs who have the option to give a ‘physical’ addition to the performance. To frame this within the work of an existing performance artist, Marina Abramović has created this audience-performer interaction, but rather than choosing to limit the audiences’ involvement, and therefore their effect on her, she gave them free reign, something which we are keen to limit. Abramović stated after her performance of Rhythm 0 (1974) she realised that “…the public can kill you. If you give them total freedom, they will become frenzied enough to kill you” ((Abramović in Sean O’Hagan (2010) ‘Interview: Marina Abramovic’, The Guardian/The Observer, Online: http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/oct/03/interview-marina-abramovic-performance-artist (accessed 01st March 2013).)).

“Rather than only “touching with the eyes” [we] arrive at seeing through a sense of touch” ((Hiller, Susan (2006) Susan Hiller: Recall. Selected Works 1969-2004, ed. James Lingwood, Gateshead: Baltic, p. 17)) implies that physical contact is essential is really ‘seeing’ the performance, rather than simply observing. To leave your mark on the performance as an audience member whilst also taking something personal away for the experience. Allowing the audience to touch you as a performer is a very intimate act, especially with all the connotations of the bedroom, but for the performance to be ‘seen’ rather than simply viewed, I think that is it essential  that the audience must leave their trace in the space, while also taking some of the performance away with them.

“The immersive space remains fundamentally an experimental and sentient place, though it is also a means of escaping our everyday conditions” ((Oliveira, Nicolas de, Nicola Oxley and Micheal Petry (2003) Installation Art in the New Millennium, London: Thames & Hudson, Ltd., p. 53.)).

While exposing the audience to something which is usually  witnessed behind closed doors, we are  creating a fully immersive space; a space which holds its own realities, rules and atmosphere. By surrounding the audience in a fully fledged experience, this will allow them to temporarily escape from their everyday conditions, but hopefully allow them to leave our created world in a changed state, with an experience which they will hopefully remember. Be it either through some traumatic experience, or one of pure safety and comfort.

When you were younger your cupboard was home to a monster or two. Under your bed held the Boogie Man. And your bed protected you, kept you safe. Your night light or landing light also made you feel safe.

Yes?

What happens if we expose those ‘monsters’ hiding in cupboard and the inherent fears that something is lurking under the bed and bring them to light in such a way that you are unable to escape them? Susan Hiller argues that “I think we have enough mysterious darkness within ourselves and our own culture to be getting on with” ((Hiller, Susan (2000) Dream Machines, London: Hayward Gallery Publishing, p. N.P.)), implying that we don’t need to show the darkness which dwells within; to leave the grotesque at home and not to solidify it in art. However, I think this give us more justification to stage the grotesque and hidden secrets. For people to face their “mysterious darkness”, we must show the subconscious and the usually hidden fantasies unashamedly in order to evoke a reaction from the audience. Whether it be fear, disgust, admiration or even arousal.  

Liminal, Compact and Ignored Spaces

Compact Spaces

Exploring the work of Eve Dent and Willie Dorner, I explored the places in the house where we don’t normally place out bodies. My two favourite places were the bathroom and living room cupboards. One was compact and another was ignored due to the boiler being its main purpose. I wanted to mould and force my body into the spaces as much as possible to create a relationship within them.

this
Photo Taken By Jozey Wade
thiss
Photo Taken By Jozey Wade

With these images, I am going to experiment with chopping them up and replacing them into these spaces so it is as if I am embedded within the spaces. I have practiced with cropping and distorting one of the images. I may have to re take the images to present more skin to show there is a body there.

 

 

 

 

IMG-20130305-00643
Photo Taken By Jozey Wade. Edited by Faye McDool

This distraught image was influenced by Pablo Picasso work. He distraught’s portraits and painting by splitting the images up into blocks. The most famous painting of his where this is exampled is ‘Seated Nude’ (1909-10).

 

Pablo Picasso, ‘Seated Nude’ 1909-10
Seated Nude ((Pablo PicassoSeated Nude 1909-10 http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/picasso-seated-nude-n05904))

Distinguishing the image, hopefully will make the audience see the surreal image of my body in the space.

“The reproduction of a painting or object, however perfect, is always, definitively, its betrayal. And that betrayal is the much greater when it invovles not objects or paintings but the whole space” ((Buren, D. 1973, Five Texts, London: John Weber Gallery and John Wendle Gallery p19)) .

I came across another artist work which fitted my photo collage creation. Sir Eduardo Paolozzi sculpture gave me the inspiration to place my cut up image back into the place, however to mould the image so it created a 3D image as it seemed to be embedded into the wall.

Sir Eduardo Paolozzi, ‘Michelangelo's 'David'’ ?1987
Sir Eduardo Paolozzi ((Sir Eduardo PaolozziMichelangelo’s ‘David’ ?1987 online: http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/paolozzi-michelangelos-david-t06944))

However, when trying this, as the image was so dark, it was difficult to see the image when it was placed back into the site it was taken.

Continuing this idea, I shall retake the images, however showing more flesh, so the audience can see on the images that it is a human body in that space.

With this inside the space it was originally taken, I may challenge the audience to find me and to ‘join me’ within the space. This will also link with my work with the CCTV as I will be watching if they take up the challenge and having audience participation with my experience. ((Kaye, Nick 2000, Site Specific Art: Performance, Place and Documentation. Routledge))

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“CCTV surveillance which naturally invites comparisons” Norris and Armstrong 1999

We created a teaser for the public to see to advertise our performance. We decided to use placards for the trailer to not reveal too much about the performance and to demonstrate a brief idea of the piece. With this, we used quotes from Pearsons “Site Specific” ((Pearson, Mike 2010, Site Specific Performance, Palgrave)) and also definitions from the Oxford dictionary so who ever watches to teaser will get a grasp of our concept.

Creating the trailer did come with its difficulties as we were unable to cut and crop shots from the CCTV recording system as we had no kind of advance technology.  We explored the full use of the CCTV system and played around with using the different camera angles.

One more trailer we made was an Hangman game trailer which eventually read “West Parade”. This enabled the CCTV group and I explore with becoming technical with the equipment we are using. Also this trailer revealed more to the audience.

“CCTV surveillance which naturally invites comparisons with bentham’s nineteenth-century design for the new  model prison, with its central observation tower, allowing the augraads to see everything without ever being seen themselves” ((Norris, Clive. Armstrong, Gary, 1999 The Maximum Surveillance Society; The Rise of CCTV. Berg. p91))

After exploring with the CCTV and trailers, ideas were formed for this to be used during the performance. We wanted to focus on giving the audience a message which they could leave the house with. During the performance we will hide various placards which will only make sense when the audience arrive in the CCTV room. As the screen is split into 9 shots of the house, we thought it would be interesting to have relevant quotes stuck around the house and it would all make sense when unravel only in our room. “Explicitly provoked the reader’s self-reflective awareness of relationships between text, space and eye movement” ((Kaye, Nick, 2007 Multi Media; Video Installation Performance Routledge p101)) . Gillian Wearing, a photographer, uses placards in her work collection called “Signs that Say What You Want Them To Say and Not Signs that Say What Someone Else Wants You To Say”.  She expresses her thoughts and feelings by using members of the public to hold her signs up. This would again revival what we have witnessed and why we have been watching the audience member throughout the performance.

Gillian Wearing OBE, ‘'Everything is connected in life...'’ 1992-3
Gilliam Wearing ((image: online (http://www.tate.org.uk/art/artworks/wearing-everything-is-connected-in-life-p78351) accessed 05/03/2013)).

To expose the hidden message, there will be pre-recorded video which follows a person on the screen as they take a tour of the house, uncovering the messages from room to room. However, we would be using the CCTV blind spots and the CCTV 9 grid layout to create the sense of the person going from room to room in the order of the 9 grid on the CCTV screen.

IMG-20130129-00499
Taken By Faye McDool

The pre-recorded performance was influenced by Fiona Templeton and Michael Ramtomski’s Recognition performance. This piece largely influenced out idea as it involves “audience participation” were audience discomfort was at risk, “interaction” and “opportunity to take part” ((Templeton, Fiona May 2006, Audience Interaction: A Presence Workshop. accessed 05/03/2013 http://presence.stanford.edu:3455/Collaboratory/1107)) . We wanted to play on these three concepts to for the audience to feel as they have created a relationship without them seeing us apart from on the prerecording. Again, the audience will fully understand all of your work when they enter the CCTV room.